DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2016 Mazda MX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
CX-4ModelMX-5
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabrio
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
200 km/hTop speed214 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
158 HPPower160 HP
202 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
225/65 R17Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4633 mmLength3915 mm
1840 mmWidth1735 mm
1535 mmHeight1225 mm
1390 KgWeight1090 kg
—Luggage capacity130 lt
2700 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda CX-4

No additional feature records are available.

Mazda MX-5Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2016 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…