E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S40
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelS40
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S40
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
208 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
210 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo S40
4865 mmLength4476 mm
1840 mmWidth1770 mm
1450 mmHeight1454 mm
1300 KgWeight1498 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2012 Great Wall CowryVS2012 Mazda 6Great Wall Cowry vs Mazda 62012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVS2012 Mazda 6BMW 3 Serisi vs Mazda 62012 and 2012 model years2012 Citroen C5VS2012 Mazda 6Citroen C5 vs Mazda 62012 and 2012 model years2012 Volvo C30VS2012 Mazda 6Volvo C30 vs Mazda 62012 and 2012 model years2012 Volvo S40VS2012 Mazda 6Volvo S40 vs Mazda 62012 and 2012 model years

Comments are loading…