DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
S40Model6
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
350 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
4476 mmLength4865 mm
1770 mmWidth1840 mm
1454 mmHeight1450 mm
1498 KgWeight1300 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…