DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
C30Model6
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 6
9,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
350 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 6
4266 mmLength4865 mm
1782 mmWidth1840 mm
1447 mmHeight1450 mm
1450 KgWeight1300 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…