DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Cowry vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMazda
CowryModel6
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
170 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower145 HP
185 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4865 mm
1704 mmWidth1840 mm
1845 mmHeight1450 mm
1510 KgWeight1300 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Cowry and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…