DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 BMW 3 Serisi vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationMazda 6
BMWMakeMazda
3 SerisiModel6
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationMazda 6
10,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower145 HP
190 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationMazda 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationMazda 6
4612 mmLength4865 mm
1782 mmWidth1840 mm
1384 mmHeight1450 mm
1595 KgWeight1300 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 BMW 3 Serisi and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…