DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Volkswagen Eos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
6ModelEos
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
208 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
145 HPPower140 HP
210 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R16; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4423 mm
1840 mmWidth1791 mm
1450 mmHeight1444 mm
1300 KgWeight1592 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…