2012 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.0 SKYACTIV-G (145 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Great Wall Cowry Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Great Wall
Cowry
Great Wall Cowry 2.0 (143 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Great Wall Cowry
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
MazdaMakeGreat Wall
6ModelCowry
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower143 HP
210 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationGreat Wall Cowry
4865 mmLength4574 mm
1840 mmWidth1704 mm
1450 mmHeight1845 mm
1300 KgWeight1510 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…