1995 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 3.0 V6 (132 Hp) 1995Overall Score65.25/100
1995 Ford Tempo vs 1995 Renault Safrane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Renault
Safrane
Renault Safrane 3.0 V6 4x4 (B54B,B544) 1995Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TempoSpecificationRenault Safrane
FordMakeRenault
TempoModelSafrane
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford TempoSpecificationRenault Safrane
—0–100 km/h9,8 s
170 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2975 cc
132 HPPower167 HP
204 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TempoSpecificationRenault Safrane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TempoSpecificationRenault Safrane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TempoSpecificationRenault Safrane
4490 mmLength4734 mm
1735 mmWidth1818 mm
1340 mmHeight1448 mm
1180 KgWeight1580 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2764 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Ford Tempo and 1995 Renault Safrane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…