DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Debonair vs 1995 Ford Tempo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tempo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
DebonairModelTempo
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
150 HPPower132 HP
226 NmTorque204 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15 HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4975 mmLength4490 mm
1815 mmWidth1735 mm
1440 mmHeight1340 mm
—Weight1180 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Debonair and 1995 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…