DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Nissan Quest vs 1995 Ford Tempo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tempo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
QuestModelTempo
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
151 HPPower132 HP
235 NmTorque204 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption15 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4823 mmLength4490 mm
1872 mmWidth1735 mm
1717 mmHeight1340 mm
1811 KgWeight1180 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Nissan Quest and 1995 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…