DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Chevrolet Omega vs 1995 Ford Tempo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tempo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
OmegaModelTempo
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
165 HPPower132 HP
230 NmTorque204 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4768 mmLength4490 mm
1760 mmWidth1735 mm
1454 mmHeight1340 mm
1497 KgWeight1180 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Chevrolet Omega and 1995 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…