DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Renault Safrane vs 1995 Ford Tempo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tempo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
SafraneModelTempo
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
214 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2975 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
167 HPPower132 HP
235 NmTorque204 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
12 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4734 mmLength4490 mm
1818 mmWidth1735 mm
1448 mmHeight1340 mm
1580 KgWeight1180 Kg
2764 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Renault Safrane and 1995 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…