DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeRenault
TrackerModelLaguna
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
160 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower140 HP
182 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4575 mm
1694 mmWidth1772 mm
1689 mmHeight1429 mm
1180 KgWeight1300 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…