2004 • Nissan
Lafesta
Nissan Lafesta 2.0 2WD (137Hp) 2004Overall Score62.5/100
2004 Nissan Lafesta vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 2004Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan LafestaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
NissanMakeChevrolet
LafestaModelTracker
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Nissan LafestaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
137 HPPower129 HP
200 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan LafestaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan LafestaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/60R15 88HTyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan LafestaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4495 mmLength3780 mm
1695 mmWidth1694 mm
1615 mmHeight1689 mm
1500 KgWeight1180 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Nissan Lafesta and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…