2004 • Dodge
Neon
Dodge Neon 2.0i (133 Hp) 2004Overall Score62.25/100
2004 Dodge Neon vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 2004Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Dodge NeonSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
DodgeMakeChevrolet
NeonModelTracker
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Dodge NeonSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
8,0 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
133 HPPower129 HP
177 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Dodge NeonSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dodge NeonSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Dodge NeonSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4430 mmLength3780 mm
1712 mmWidth1694 mm
1422 mmHeight1689 mm
1170 KgWeight1180 Kg
2667 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Dodge Neon and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…