DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen C5 vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeChevrolet
C5ModelTracker
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
140 HPPower129 HP
200 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank56 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/55 R15Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4839 mmLength3780 mm
1780 mmWidth1694 mm
1511 mmHeight1689 mm
1427 KgWeight1180 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen C5 and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…