2004 • Toyota
Previa
Toyota Previa 2.0 D (116 Hp) 2004Overall Score62.5/100
2004 Toyota Previa vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 2004Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota PreviaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
ToyotaMakeChevrolet
PreviaModelTracker
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Toyota PreviaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
116 HPPower129 HP
280 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota PreviaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota PreviaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota PreviaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4750 mmLength3780 mm
1790 mmWidth1694 mm
1820 mmHeight1689 mm
1585 KgWeight1180 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Toyota Previa and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…