DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Nissan Lafesta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeNissan
TrackerModelLafesta
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
129 HPPower137 HP
182 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/75 R15Tyre size195/60R15 88H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4495 mm
1694 mmWidth1695 mm
1689 mmHeight1615 mm
1180 KgWeight1500 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Nissan Lafesta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…