DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeCitroen
TrackerModelC5
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
160 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
129 HPPower140 HP
182 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size215/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4839 mm
1694 mmWidth1780 mm
1689 mmHeight1511 mm
1180 KgWeight1427 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…