DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Cadillac Catera vs 2000 Toyota Supra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Supra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeToyota
CateraModelSupra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed241 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
203 HPPower224 HP
260 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption18 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 HR16Tyre size225/50 ZR16; 245/45 ZR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4930 mmLength4520 mm
1790 mmWidth1810 mm
1430 mmHeight1275 mm
1710 KgWeight1410 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Cadillac Catera and 2000 Toyota Supra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Supra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…