2000 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 24V (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
2000 Mazda Sentia vs 2000 Cadillac Catera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Cadillac
Catera
Cadillac Catera 3.0 (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Sentia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda SentiaSpecificationCadillac Catera
MazdaMakeCadillac
SentiaModelCatera
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda SentiaSpecificationCadillac Catera
—0–100 km/h8,5 s
220 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
205 HPPower203 HP
272 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda SentiaSpecificationCadillac Catera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
18 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda SentiaSpecificationCadillac Catera
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size225/55 HR16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda SentiaSpecificationCadillac Catera
4895 mmLength4930 mm
1795 mmWidth1790 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1600 KgWeight1710 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Sentia and 2000 Cadillac Catera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…