2000 • BMW
X5
BMW X5 3.0d (184 Hp) 2000Overall Score72.75/100
2000 BMW X5 vs 2000 Cadillac Catera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Cadillac
Catera
Cadillac Catera 3.0 (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Cadillac Catera
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X5SpecificationCadillac Catera
BMWMakeCadillac
X5ModelCatera
2000Model year2000
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
BMW X5SpecificationCadillac Catera
10,1 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
184 HPPower203 HP
410 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X5SpecificationCadillac Catera
DieselFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X5SpecificationCadillac Catera
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/65 R17Tyre size225/55 HR16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X5SpecificationCadillac Catera
4666 mmLength4930 mm
1872 mmWidth1790 mm
1717 mmHeight1430 mm
2170 KgWeight1710 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 BMW X5 and 2000 Cadillac Catera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Cadillac Catera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…