2000 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 i V6 24V (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
2000 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Cadillac Catera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Cadillac
Catera
Cadillac Catera 3.0 (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury SableSpecificationCadillac Catera
MercuryMakeCadillac
SableModelCatera
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mercury SableSpecificationCadillac Catera
—0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
271 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury SableSpecificationCadillac Catera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury SableSpecificationCadillac Catera
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/55 HR16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury SableSpecificationCadillac Catera
5070 mmLength4930 mm
1850 mmWidth1790 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
1545 KgWeight1710 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Sable and 2000 Cadillac Catera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…