DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Cadillac Catera vs 2000 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac Catera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeBMW
CateraModelX5
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
204 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
203 HPPower184 HP
260 NmTorque410 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank93 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/55 HR16Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4930 mmLength4666 mm
1790 mmWidth1872 mm
1430 mmHeight1717 mm
1710 KgWeight2170 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Cadillac Catera and 2000 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac Catera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…