DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Cadillac Catera vs 2000 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMitsubishi
CateraModelGTO
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
203 HPPower225 HP
260 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/55 HR16Tyre size225/50 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4930 mmLength4575 mm
1790 mmWidth1840 mm
1430 mmHeight1285 mm
1710 KgWeight1640 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Cadillac Catera and 2000 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…