DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Cadillac Catera vs 2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi 3000 GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMitsubishi
CateraModel3000 GT
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
203 HPPower222 HP
260 NmTorque273 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption15 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 HR16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4930 mmLength4565 mm
1790 mmWidth1840 mm
1430 mmHeight1247 mm
1710 KgWeight1450 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Cadillac Catera and 2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi 3000 GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…