DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSsangYong
XC90ModelMusso
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
243 HPPower220 HP
320 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption13,4 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption14,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4640 mm
1936 mmWidth1905 mm
1784 mmHeight1735 mm
2218 KgWeight1855 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo XC90 and 2004 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…