2004 • Lancia
Phedra
Lancia Phedra 3.0 i V6 24V (204 Hp) 2004Overall Score65.5/100
2004 Lancia Phedra vs 2004 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 3.2 (243 Hp) 2004Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Lancia Phedra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia PhedraSpecificationVolvo XC90
LanciaMakeVolvo
PhedraModelXC90
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
8Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Lancia PhedraSpecificationVolvo XC90
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
205 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
204 HPPower243 HP
270 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia PhedraSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia PhedraSpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
215/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia PhedraSpecificationVolvo XC90
4750 mmLength4807 mm
1863 mmWidth1936 mm
1760 mmHeight1784 mm
1760 KgWeight2218 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Lancia Phedra and 2004 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…