DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda MPV vs 2004 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo XC90
MazdaMakeVolvo
MPVModelXC90
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo XC90
12,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
203 HPPower243 HP
271 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
15 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo XC90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo XC90
4750 mmLength4807 mm
1830 mmWidth1936 mm
1745 mmHeight1784 mm
1710 KgWeight2218 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda MPV and 2004 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…