DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 SsangYong Musso vs 2004 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
MussoModelXC90
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3199 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
220 HPPower243 HP
310 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
13,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
14,3 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/75 R15 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4807 mm
1905 mmWidth1936 mm
1735 mmHeight1784 mm
1855 KgWeight2218 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 SsangYong Musso and 2004 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…