DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda MPV
VolvoMakeMazda
XC90ModelMPV
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda MPV
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
243 HPPower203 HP
320 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda MPV
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda MPV
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda MPV
4807 mmLength4750 mm
1936 mmWidth1830 mm
1784 mmHeight1745 mm
2218 KgWeight1710 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…