DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Lancia Phedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeLancia
XC90ModelPhedra
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
243 HPPower204 HP
320 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4750 mm
1936 mmWidth1863 mm
1784 mmHeight1760 mm
2218 KgWeight1760 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…