DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Citroen C8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCitroen
XC90ModelC8
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
243 HPPower204 HP
320 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4727 mm
1936 mmWidth1854 mm
1784 mmHeight1766-1856 mm
2218 KgWeight1762 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Citroen C8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…