DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
XC90ModelASX
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
163 HPPower147 HP
340 NmTorque360 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17 96H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4295 mm
1936 mmWidth1770 mm
1784 mmHeight1615 mm
2139 KgWeight1520 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…