2012 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.4 D4 (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score61.75/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC90
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelXC90
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC90
9,2 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
211 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
0 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC90
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank68 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC90
4765 mmLength4807 mm
1795 mmWidth1936 mm
1490 mmHeight1784 mm
1575 KgWeight2139 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…