2012 • Ford
Escape
Ford Escape 2.5 L (153 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Ford Escape vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.4 D4 (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score61.75/100
WINNER
Ford Escape
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscapeSpecificationVolvo XC90
FordMakeVolvo
EscapeModelXC90
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford EscapeSpecificationVolvo XC90
—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
153 HPPower163 HP
136 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscapeSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford EscapeSpecificationVolvo XC90
4480 mmLength4807 mm
1845 mmWidth1936 mm
1730 mmHeight1784 mm
1605 KgWeight2139 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Escape and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFord Ranger vs Ford Escape2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSVolvo XC90 vs Ford Escape2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Chairman vs Ford Escape2012 and 2012 model years
VSSuzuki Grand Vitara vs Ford Escape2012 and 2012 model years
VSChevrolet Captiva vs Ford Escape2012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…