DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 FAW Besturn B70 vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn B70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeVolvo
Besturn B70ModelXC90
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
0 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4705 mmLength4807 mm
1782 mmWidth1936 mm
1465 mmHeight1784 mm
—Weight2139 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 FAW Besturn B70 and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn B70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…