DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
XC90Model6
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
11,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
340 NmTorque0 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
4807 mmLength4765 mm
1936 mmWidth1795 mm
1784 mmHeight1490 mm
2139 KgWeight1575 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…