DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2012 Ford Escape Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFord
XC90ModelEscape
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
163 HPPower153 HP
340 NmTorque136 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
YesABS—

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4480 mm
1936 mmWidth1845 mm
1784 mmHeight1730 mm
2139 KgWeight1605 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC90 and 2012 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…