DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC60 vs 2013 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCadillac
XC60ModelCTS
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
210 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
215 HPPower211 HP
420 NmTorque246 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4829 mm
1891 mmWidth1793 mm
1713 mmHeight1440 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight1765 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC60 and 2013 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…