DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Cadillac ATS vs 2013 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolvo
ATSModelXC60
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,3 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
205 HPPower215 HP
259 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4644 mm
1805 mmWidth1891 mm
1421 mmHeight1713 mm
1505 KgWeight1816-1935 Kg
2775 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Cadillac ATS and 2013 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…