DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Caterham CSR vs 2013 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeVolvo
CSRModelXC60
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
225 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
200 HPPower215 HP
221 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,5 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4644 mm
1685 mmWidth1891 mm
1140 mmHeight1713 mm
565 KgWeight1816-1935 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Caterham CSR and 2013 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…