DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Land Rover Freelander vs 2013 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
FreelanderModelXC60
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
190 HPPower215 HP
420 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4644 mm
—Width1891 mm
1740 mmHeight1713 mm
1805 KgWeight1816-1935 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Land Rover Freelander and 2013 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…