2012 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 T3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Volvo V40 vs 2012 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.6 Energy dCi (130 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Megane
VolvoMakeRenault
V40ModelMegane
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Megane
8,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
240 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16 91H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Megane
4369 mmLength4295 mm
1802 mmWidth1808 mm
1445 mmHeight1471 mm
1268 KgWeight1320 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2641 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo V40 and 2012 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…