DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Megane vs 2012 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
MeganeModelV40
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
130 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16 91HTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4369 mm
1808 mmWidth1802 mm
1471 mmHeight1445 mm
1320 KgWeight1268 Kg
2641 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Megane and 2012 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…