DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Fluence vs 2012 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
FluenceModelV40
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
130 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/65 R15; 205/60 R16; 205/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4622 mmLength4369 mm
1809 mmWidth1802 mm
1479 mmHeight1445 mm
1349 KgWeight1268 Kg
2702 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Fluence and 2012 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…