DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C4 vs 2012 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo V40
CitroenMakeVolvo
C4ModelV40
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo V40
10,8 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 225/55 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo V40
4340 mmLength4369 mm
1799 mmWidth1802 mm
1625-1635 mmHeight1445 mm
1430 KgWeight1268 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C4 and 2012 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…