DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V40 vs 2012 Renault Fluence Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V40ModelFluence
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
240 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15; 205/60 R16; 205/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength4622 mm
1802 mmWidth1809 mm
1445 mmHeight1479 mm
1268 KgWeight1349 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2702 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V40 and 2012 Renault Fluence approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…