2012 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 T3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Volvo V40 vs 2012 Citroen C4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
C4
Citroen C4 1.8 HDi (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C4
VolvoMakeCitroen
V40ModelC4
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C4
8,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C4
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank63 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C4
4369 mmLength4340 mm
1802 mmWidth1799 mm
1445 mmHeight1625-1635 mm
1268 KgWeight1430 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo V40 and 2012 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…